Atrios makes a funny

Eschaton

While Benen is correct about the odd discrepancy between the Post’s coverage of Ensign and Massa, there is one reasonable explanation for some of that discrepancy. The Massa story is more of a “local” story, in that it’s about the lives and experiences of Capitol Hill staffers.

Uh. Ensign was bonking one of his staffers, and paying off her husband, another one of his staffers, to keep him from blowing the whistle. Of course, both of them have since left washington, so maybe that doesn’t count.

I think what the shorthand really meant is “the lives and experiences of capitol hill staffers who are willing to have drinks or otherwise spend time schmoozing with Washington Post reporters”. In other words, the stories are because the people at the Post are lazy, and the government employees they like to hang out with are inveterate gossips. Coverage of the village, for the village, by the village

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: