Why let a mere law stand in the way of profits?

Here’s an interesting response to that pesky wiretapping law that says it’s illegal to read people’s packet without their consent

NebuAd makes meal of opt-out cookie | The Register

It’s worth noting, however, that these federal statutes were enshrined before the internet changed the universe. They may or may not apply to newfangled privacy invasions like Phorm and NebuAd.

“I’m not so easily convinced the wiretapping laws come into play here. The purpose and techniques of true wiretapping are really very different from tracking someone on the internet,” says Jonathan Kramer, a telecoms-savvy attorney with the Kramer Telecom Law Firm. “These laws are like rubber bands. You can stretch them to new technologies – but they may pop right back at you.”

I can see his point though — listening to someone’s phone conversations or email because you want to target them individually is different from wiretapping them because you think you can make a profit selling their conversations en masse. It’s like the difference between cutting someone’s brake lines and making a coporate decision to sell 10 million cars with nonworking brakes because you make more money that way.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: